[-empyre-] mobile media debate
Hello everyone,
I don't think the important issue here is whether mobile media have
allowed for the development of multiple identities within the same
person... that debate goes back to the early chatrooms where people
could be who they wanted and have different identities at the same
time. Besides I must have to agree that a stable, clearly defined and
unified self is part of the modern ideology (as was already stated
here), and being such, it is culturally defined and context
dependent. It doesn't seem plausible that mobile media or the like
have created the urge or need to have fluid identities... but this is
another reminder that all those big narratives, perfect, all-
encompassing modernist narratives are failing us and are being
replaced by subjective, multiple accounts of reality and ourselves.
It is not us who are different because of technology. Modernism has
failed us in so many ways and this is just another one...
But despite this issue of unified versus multiple identities, and
going back a bit to my previous post, we're developing a notion of
space (and to a large extent due to mobile media) that is less
defined by geographic features. Telegraphy, satellites and all ways
of communicating through large distances have shortened space, but
now it seems that it has become some sort of relational space defined
by the number of available connections. The more connections
available to you (through you mobile device for instance) the more
central you are. The fewer connections (or the total absence of them
by not having one of those devices) the more peripheric (outside of
known space, a foreigner, banned, outcast...) one is. And this seems
to be structurally different from the changes other ways of
communicating have caused to the notion of space.
anyway, just my opinion
Best,
Luis Silva
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and
MHonArc 2.6.8.